Categories
Surveys Walk Ride subgroups

Stockport 2023 elections candidate questionnaire

It’s election season in Stockport, and with all seats up for grabs it’s a crucial moment for the future of the borough.

Stockport’s Walk Ride groups have prepared the following questions and sent them to all candidates. We will add their replies to this page as they arrive.
 

The questions


Bramhall North


Bredbury Green & Romiley


Cheadle East & Cheadle Hulme North


Cheadle Hulme South


Cheadle West & Gatley


Davenport & Cale Green


Edgeley


Heatons South


Marple North


Offerton


Norbury & Woodsmoor


Reddish North


Reddish South


 

The questions

1. School streets

A School Street is a road outside a school with a temporary restriction on motorised traffic at school drop-off and pick-up times. The restriction applies to school traffic and through traffic. The result is a safer, healthier and pleasant environment for everyone.

School Street schemes offer a proactive solution for school communities to tackle air pollution, poor health and road danger reduction. A School Street scheme will encourage a healthier lifestyle and active travel to school for families and lead to a better environment for everyone.[1]

Do you commit to supporting a School Street in your ward, and to enabling the introduction of School Streets across Stockport?

2. Barrier-free active travel

Physical barriers such as chicanes and bollards have been installed across Stockport on walking and cycling routes to prevent access by motorised vehicles. However, these barriers frequently restrict access by legitimate users, particularly disabled people, parents/carers with pushchairs and users of non-standard cycles.

Many of these barriers are in contravention of the Equality Act 2010 which requires that public bodies must not only alter or remove existing physical features that discriminate but must also ensure that new features are accessible to all.[2]

Do you commit to the removal of physical barriers that prevent access to active travel routes across Stockport?

3. 20 mph speed limits

Evidence shows that reducing speed limits reduces road traffic collisions and saves lives, and NICE and the WHO recommend 20 mph where people and motor vehicles mix.

Additionally, research has found that fuel efficiency reaches a peak when speed is limited to 20 mph. Drivers can save up to 10p per mile without seeing longer journey times, due to the stop-start nature of urban traffic.

Surveys reveal that the vast majority of residents support 20 mph speed limits, and their popularity generally increases after introduction.

Do you commit to the rollout of 20 mph speed limits on all residential roads in Stockport?

4. Space for cycling

66% of UK adults in the National Travel Attitudes Survey agreed that “it is too dangerous for me to cycle on the roads”, and the figure is even higher among women (71%).

Recent research suggests that building protected cycle lanes leads to safer roads for all road users.

Do you commit to the creation of direct and protected safe cycling routes on major roads in Stockport?

5. Anything else?

Is there anything else you would like to say?
 

Bramhall North

Deborah Hind – Green Party

1. School streets –Yes.

2. Barrier-free active travel – Yes.

3. 20 mph speed limits – Yes.

4. Space for cycling –Yes.
 

Bredbury Green & Romiley

Peter Black – Labour

1. School streets – Yes, I think School Streets are essential for making children safe and enhancing the quality of life for everyone. I think the previous Stockport School Street trial was misconceived and always bound to fail. I would support every ward having an initial School Street, with ANPR enforcement, with this extended as soon as possible to every school where a School Street was feasible and desirable.

2. Barrier-free active travel – Yes, I think Stockport should start an immediate programme to remove physical barriers on active travel routes.

3. 20 mph speed limits – Yes, I think the Council should implement their own resolution immediately. Even one death saved per year shows a positive case for the public sector to implement 20 mph speed limits on all residential roads in Stockport.

4. Space for cycling – Yes.

5. Anything else? – Active travel has the greatest potential to improve the quality of life for residents in Stockport. It should be a council priority.
 

Mark Roberts – Liberal Democrats

1. School streets – Play streets and school streets was something I pushed to reform council policy on from opposition through scrutiny and I do think the policy and council approach is much better than it was, there is always more that can be done and much is resource and staff capacity dependant. There is a frustrating reality that local authorities outside London don’t have the same base of resource or capacity and legislation to back them up. I’ve been really pleased to see under a Lib Dem administration we have worked to explore what works for us locally as some of the schemes worked better than others when trialled. Finding an answer to local residents’ concerns around displaced parking issues is always going to be the biggest challenge which is why a broad active travel approach and engagement are essential and park and strides or safe cycle routes to schools may be preferential.

Where my community supports a school street I will support it. Some schools lend themselves to the approach more than others but any measures that encourage active travel to and from school I will very happily work with officers, the schools and wider community to find a way forward as I have through my first term.

2. Barrier-free active travel – I am very proud that under the current Lib Dem administration we introduced one of the most progressive access policies for barriers, replacing the approach started by the previous Labour administration and making it much more legitimate access friendly and I know other councils locally are looking at our policy and how they may take from it things which are applicable. The replacement of old barriers won’t happen overnight as with so much of this work in this area it is funding-dependent and that funding decision is usually dependent on other organisations’ agendas.

As and when action can be taken, I believe it now can and will thanks to the new policy guidance we introduced. There is more to be done but we are now moving in the right direction.

3. 20 mph speed limits – I am very proud that I as proposer and the Liberal Democrats across Stockport led the council chamber to agree to adopt 20mph on residential roads across Stockport in a council motion. We are committed to increasing the number of 20mph limits on residential roads and I do believe the direction of travel is now heading in the right way but as with other areas of this work we need the council to be funded properly and to take local residents with us. We have asked the GM Combined Authority to provide more funding to allow us to expand this more quickly than current funding has allowed so far and encouraged a GM wide adoption. This is also something National Government needs to lead on to help change the mindset of drivers when traveling in a residential area and ensure that the police will take action to tackle speeding.

I think there is a frustrating timescale that is a reality in this agenda but I do think thanks to the LibDems it is now on its way for Stockport.

4. Space for cycling – Yes, where this is the right thing to pursue to garner the most modal shift. The council has been ambitious in its applications for funding under the Liberal Democrats seeking to serve the entire borough with the applications submitted and hopefully we’ll have some good news on Active Travel 4 funding for more cycle schemes in the early summer. We continue to work up plans for new schemes so we are ready to bid for any new funding as it becomes available but the council does have to work within the guidelines that accompany the funding and these can change and notice to apply for funding can be frustratingly tight. I do believe that proper engagement and consultation to ensure we take local communities with us is essential to ensure that any modal shift is sustainable.

5. Anything else? – Micro mobility is going to be a really interesting area to see develop over the coming years with new challenges, priorities and conflicts likely on our active travel routes. I’m keen to learn what has worked and what hasn’t from other authorities but we need national government to catch up on this area with legislation or risk being left behind by the population we represent.

I do think given limited resources that what we have to prioritise is garnering modal shift and encouraging people to walk or wheel the journeys they currently take by car but don’t have to.
 

Lisa Smart – Liberal Democrats

1. School streets – We’ve had mixed results with the pilots so far. I’m very committed to proper engagement and consultation to make sure there is community support for them so that, where they are supported, they bring about the change that’s hoped for.

2. Barrier-free active travel – The current Lib Dem administration introduced one of the most progressive access policies for barriers, replacing the approach started by the previous Labour administration and which we hope other councils will eventually copy. We are replacing the existing barriers which do not comply with this policy with more accessible ones as quickly as we can, as funding and opportunity allows.

3. 20mph speed limits – The Lib Dems in Stockport are committed to increasing the number of 20mph limits on residential roads and the we brought a motion through Full Council in July 2021 on this very issue, calling for their introduction on all residential roads. We have asked the GM Combined Authority to provide more funding to allow us to expand this more quickly than current funding has allowed so far.

4. Space for cycling – The council has been very successful in obtaining new funding for cycle schemes. We continue to work up plans for new schemes so we are ready to bid for any new funding as it becomes available. We have to work within the guidelines that accompany the funding and these often encompass protected cycle routes, which will eventually link up different areas of the borough.  Again we are committed to proper engagement and consultation to ensure we take local communities with us and so that any modal shift is sustainable.
 

Cheadle East & Cheadle Hulme North

Jilly Julian – Liberal Democrats

1. School streets – I think that School Streets are a great thing, and where the community want them, would absolutely support them.  It’s critical that the engagement and consultation around school streets is undertaken thoroughly to ensure full community support.  But we’re committed to finding ways to make the process and implementation of school streets easier in areas where the community want them.

2. Barrier-free active travel – I have always personally advocated for the removal of A frames, tight chicanes, and any barriers that restrict access for all.  My enquiries and discussions with GMP confirmed that those barriers do little to curb off-road biking and ASB, which is usually the justification offered.  But they do restrict access – often to essential green spaces – for those with buggies, wheelchair users, those with mobility aids etc. and access for all should be the starting principle.  The Lib Dems introduced a new, more progressive access policy which is a great stride, and are now exploring funding to help expedite the replacement of non-policy-compliant barriers.

3. 20mph speed limits – I seconded the ‘20’s plenty’ motion proposed by the Lib Dems in the Council chamber, and we continue to push for GMCA funding to assist roll out and implementation across the borough.

4. Space for cycling – I myself cycle around the Borough (and beyond) a LOT.  It’s my primary transport for solo journeys, and I spend most of those journeys fervently wishing for protected cycle lanes!  As the Bee Network continues to develop, we continue to look for ways to ensure the routes within there are well-linked, well-signed and well-protected wherever possible – understanding that this always has to be within Highways guidelines and also that particular project’s funding guidelines. The Lib Dems are committed to contributing to modal shift and continue to look for creative ways it can be achieved and supported.
 

Cheadle Hulme South

Keith Holloway – Liberal Democrats

1. School streets – The council undertook a pilot of school streets and has also introduced an extra new school street scheme since. So far the success rate has been mixed, so a Lib Dem administration would continue to look at the best way to implement these before rolling them out on a wider basis.  We are committed to proper engagement and consultation to ensure there is community support for such schemes so that, where they are supported, they can deliver sustainable modal shift.

2. Barrier-free active travel – The current Lib Dem administration introduced one of the most progressive access policies for barriers, replacing the approach started by the previous Labour administration and which we hope other councils will eventually copy. We are replacing the existing barriers which do not comply with this policy with more accessible ones as quickly as we can, as funding and opportunity allows.

3. 20mph speed limits – We are committed to increasing the number of 20mph limits on residential roads and the Lib Dems brought a motion through Full Council in July 2021 on this very issue, calling for their introduction on all residential roads. We have asked the GM Combined Authority to provide more funding to allow us to expand this more quickly than current funding has allowed so far.

4. Space for cycling – The council has been very successful in obtaining new funding for cycle schemes. We continue to work up plans for new schemes so we are ready to bid for any new funding as it becomes available. We do have to work within the guidelines that accompany the funding and these often encompass protected cycle routes, which will eventually link up different areas of the borough. Again we are committed to proper engagement and consultation to ensure we take local communities with us and so that any modal shift is sustainable.
 

Cheadle West & Gatley

Rayne Barrett – Green Party

1. School streets – Yes.

2. Barrier-free active travel – Yes.

3. 20 mph speed limits – Yes.

4. Space for cycling – Yes.
 

Davenport & Cale Green

Janet Mobbs – Labour

1. School streets – I actively campaigned for and supported the introduction of a School Street trial on Broomfield Drive in South Reddish. I worked with residents, the school, and Stockport Council to get the trial developed, agreed, and implemented, and subsequently worked with the same agencies to extend the trial. Sadly, funding for the scheme dried up but I continued to work with agencies with a view to implementing a permanent scheme. The end of trial consultation demonstrated the many benefits that residents, the school, the children, and their families got from the School Street, and I would fully support the rollout of more School Streets across Stockport.

2. Barrier-free active travel – I have supported the development and improvement of several walking and cycling routes across Stockport, using my position on the Heatons and Reddish Area Committee to raise concerns about physical barriers on routes. I have always liaised with WalkRide Heatons to ensure that my views and actions have been informed by the experience of cyclists and pedestrians and not just based on my own, limited experiences. I believe that SMBC must strive to make all routes fully inclusive and accessible.

3. 20 mph speed limits – I fully support the roll out of 20mph on all residential streets. Not only is this safer for all users, but it also makes for quieter, calmer neighbourhoods.

4. Space for cycling – It is really clear to me that protected cycle lanes will encourage more cycling by ensuring safer cycle spaces where even non-cyclists are more likely to be willing to give cycling a try. We should also be looking to plan more direct, better maintained and lit cycling routes that make cycling a safe and effective means of travel.

5. Anything else? – In addition to barrier-free cycling and walking routes and more School Streets, I would like to see more support for communities to introduce Play Streets. I would also like to thank WalkRide Heatons for the invaluable briefings they have provided for councillors. As a non-cyclist, these have been really informative.
 

John Pearson – Stockport Fights Austerity No To Cuts

1. School streets – Yes, if elected I will support the introduction of School Streets in Stockport. Protection of our children against the scandalously illegal levels of air pollution is of paramount importance. I would also support the introduction of heavy penalties for motorists who leave engines ‘ticking over’ when picking up children.

2. Barrier-free active travel – I am firmly committed to positive action to remove all barriers to disabled people having equal access to public wayfaring and facilities. If I am elected, I would press for meaningful consultation on all Council schemes for erection of barriers to motor traffic and for proper equal impact assessments to be produced which demonstrate that there is compatibility with the Equality Act 2010 and the public sector equality duty.

3. 20mph speed limits – Yes, if elected I would be supportive, subject, in all cases, to meaningful public consultation, the results of which are heeded, of the roll out of 20mph speed limits on all residential streets. These must be well signposted. As a motorist myself, I have too often seen ’20 mph zone ends’ signs without having earlier seen prominent ’20 mph zone starts’ signs.

4. Space for cycling – Yes, I would support schemes for creation of protected cycle lanes.

5. Anything else? – I firmly support improvement of public transport and, with particular reference to question number 2, the removal of the substantial barriers which still exist, to disabled people having equal access to all forms of public transport, requires urgent and concerted action.
 

Ashley Walker – Stockport Fights Austerity No To Cuts

1. School streets – I think school streets are a great idea and am happy to commit to doing all i can, if elected, to help see them implemented in the ward I’m standing in and across Stockport.

2. Barrier-free active travel – I agree that we must remove physical barriers which prevent access for the groups mentioned in this question, and of course any other people similarly affected. I am sure if people driving motorised vehicles is a nuisance in some such streets and paths, the people of Stockport can work together to find a solution which doesn’t come at the expense of the inclusion and reasonable moblity of such groups of people. I am happy to commit, if elected, to help make this a reality.

3. 20mph speed limits – A 20 mph limit on residential roads sounds like a reasonable and much needed policy, I am happy to commit, if elected, to help make this happen.

4. Space for cycling – More cycle routes across Stockport are dearly needed. If elected, i will do what i can to help make more such routes be created.

5. Anything else? – The only thing I would add is that the massive expansion, improvement and cheapening of public transport, powered with renewable energy, would help improve the lives of people and complement the ideas talked about in this survey. I am deepely committed to doing all I can, if elected, to help see such public transport become a reality in Stockport. As would schemes which help low-income people purchase cycles and other needed equipment to enjoy such walking and cycle routes.
 

Edgeley

Matt Wynne – Edgeley Community Association

1. School streets – During my first term as a Councillor I introduced two School Street trials to St Matthews and Our Lady’s Primary Schools which were successful but have been difficult to run due to resource. Now Stockport Council has the powers to regulate TRO Offences using camera enforcement School Streets it should ensure a School Street is chosen as part of its initial programme. What’s more important, ensuring yellow hatch boxes are kept clear or our children are safe getting to and from the school gates?
2. Barrier-free active travel – I have removed a number of unsuitable barriers to walking and cycling during my first term of office and will continue to advocate for the removal of barriers that prevent legitimate access regardless of physical mobility to our Rights of Way.
3. 20mph speed limits – Edgeley Ward predominantly is 20mph zoned on residential streets. I do have concerns about the stretch of 30mph Edgeley Road between Mountfield Road and Naples Road and would like to see 20mph trialled there when Stockport Academy is starting and finishing for the school day.
4. Space for cycling – It’s not me that needs convincing. We have a shameful lack of segregated cycle infrastructure in this Borough. If we want to get more people particularly women on two wheels we need to start segregating the main roads.
 

Heatons South

Malcolm Allan – Liberal Democrats

1. School streets – The Council has conducted a trial of school streets on the Borough, with mixed success based on feedback from residents involved. Our Lib Dem group have committed to look at these results and try to find improvements. Me and my colleagues are in favour of stimulating a better situation around all our schools and also in favour of making our streets safer for pedestrians in particular.

2. Barrier-free active travel – During the last 12 months the Lib Dem group took proactive steps to tackle this issue. We think we have been progressive in this area and are ahead of other councils. Under a new policy we are removing the old barriers which do not comply with this policy and replacing with more accessible barriers and will continue this, if in control in the year ahead.

3. 20mph speed limits – My group brought a motion to full Council on this which called for 20mph to apply in all residential areas in the Borough. We asked for more funding from GM to help us and we continue to support more limited local schemes wherever we can – where we are leading Area Committees we have actively put forward schemes and in my ward in particular, we have also been successful in getting a B feeder route reduced from 40 mph to 30 mph. In addition we are pushing for speedwatch schemes to support this move, via the police, to ensure it isn’t just a sign but is also enforced.

4. Space for cycling – Encouraging people to use cycling as an alternative form of travel to cars is very important for many reasons, including climate change, air pollution and congestion. Stockport has used GM and central Government money to put in fairly significant new schemes and will continue to do so under the Lib Dem administration, always subject to public consultation and engagement. I think Chris Boardman highlighted the issue when he epitomised his campaign as aiming to make the car driver, sitting in a queue, seeing the cyclist go safely by, think that’s a better way that I must try.
 

Claire Vibert – Labour

1. School streets – Yes.

2. Barrier-free active travel – Yes – provided there are alternative ways to prevent motorised vehicles accessing the routes, and this also deters people from walking and cycling.

3. 20mph speed limits – Yes.

4. Space for cycling – Yes.

5. Anything else? – Very happy to support the development of walking and cycling. Enabling safe walking for short journeys in particular can have a number of benefits for individuals and wider society and I’m in favour of improving this across Stockport.
 

Marple North

Geoff Abell – Liberal Democrats

Rather than answering each question, I will state that I am fully behind the concept of promoting walking and cycling in GM, I plan to stay in contact with my local Marple Walk Ride group (along with Cllr Aron Thornley), I agree with your proposals re schools, segregating, walkway blocking and in particular the 20 mph zones should be implemented as widely as possible. Going further, we should have plans to promote modal shift. When I was last a councillor, I was Stockport “champion of cycling”, helped build and promote Cheadle cycleways (although did not manage to do anything more locally at the time) and talked about active travel a lot on TfGM committees.
 

Norbury & Woodsmoor

Jon Byrne – Labour

1. School streets – Yes, I am fully committed to the introduction of school streets and if elected will be in touch with all the schools in the ward to work with them towards this goal. My opinion is that they should be the norm across primary schools, rather than the exception. I also believe that they should be supported and funded where possible by the council, not only rely on volunteers.

2. Barrier-free active travel – Yes. This is already something I have highlighted to the council on numerous occasions and would continue to do so. I am aware that there are issues that traditionally have attempted to be mitigated with barriers (off-road motorbikes for example) and I completely appreciate people’s concerns with off-road bikes, however, this should never come at the expense of access for all to active travel. We need to work with GMP to resolve the issue which I will commit to do.

3. 20 mph speed limits – Yes. I would like to see this supported by enforcement.

4. Space for cycling – Yes. As someone who uses a bike daily, I am all too aware of the perception and reality of the danger on many of our major roads. When travelling with my children I often avoid the most direct and natural routes to avoid these locations. I will promote and support the idea of direct and protected routes, however, these must be of a high standard.

5. Anything else? – I am an avid supporter and user of active travel and will work to support it and encourage more people who are able to move away from personal cars for appropriate journeys. I would also like to ensure that every child has the opportunity to take part in a funded Bikeability course before the end of primary school by helping schools access funding.
 

Dominic Hardwick – Liberal Democrats

1. School streets – Yes, where they are supported locally. We have trialled these already and the results have been good in some areas, but not so good elsewhere. If we can make them work, then yes.

2. Barrier-free active travel – Yes. The Lib Dems have been doing this. We are replacing non-compliant barriers as quickly as we can given funding and opportunities.

3. 20 mph speed limits – Yes, and we have asked Greater Manchester’s combined authority for more funding so we can do this more quickly. We have been calling for this for several years now.

4. Space for cycling – Yes, and we are ready to bid for new funding to do this. We will engage with communities to make sure that it is done right.
 

Pete West – Liberal Democrats

1. School streets – Yes the Lib Dem administration would continue to look at the best way to implement School Streets before rolling them out on a wider basis. This must be supported by proper engagement and consultation to ensure the schemes can succeed and deliver modal shift.

2. Barrier-free active travel – The Lib Dems have introduced a new access policy and have started replacing existing non-compliant barriers. This will continue as quickly as possible.

3. 20 mph speed limits – The Lib Dems have supported 20 mph limits on residential streets for a number of years. We have requested more funding from the GM combined authority to increase the pace of their introduction.

4. Space for cycling – The Lib Dems have continued to work on new plans for cycle schemes and will support bids for new funding as it becomes available. We are committed to local engagement and consultation to take communities with us.

5. Anything else? – Electric car charging infrastructure is increasingly becoming an issue on pavements. I would like to ensure this isn’t installed or utilised in a way that impedes pedestrians’ use of footways.

 

Offerton

Will Sharp – Labour

1. School streets – Absolutely. We have several schools in Offerton and the response on the doorstep is showing that increasing traffic is posing a safety risk to children, parents and residents.

2. Barrier-free active travel – There are several routes that are inaccessible and I would definitely look at this on an case-by-case basis for where residents feel it would be useful to have barriers removed to make routes more accessible for all.

3. 20 mph speed limits – Yes. Safer streets is a key pledge for myself and we have to look at rolling this out across Offerton, beginning with the residential streets worst impacted by traffic and speeding.

4. Space for cycling – Yes.
 

Reddish North

David Wilson – Labour

1. School streets – Yes. I would commit to supporting this with the provision that the residents of any selected street are fully consulted on what this would involve.

2. Barrier-free active travel – I do appreciate the concerns over ‘physical barriers’ raised by Walk Ride. However, I would have to balance off other concerns that the removal of such barriers and gates on our local parks might leave some park locations vulnerable to fly tipping and ASB from off road dirt bikers. So, my answer is regrettably No.

3. 20 mph speed limits – In general yes, I would be supportive of 20mph zones. There would have to be the highways budget available to support the cost of introducing such schemes supported also by consultation with residents.

4. Space for cycling – My answer would be yes on the busiest main roads. It’s also incumbent for cyclists to wear hi vis and helmets too. Riding on the pavement at high speed is unacceptable too. I would like to see more enforcement on this.
 

Rachel Wise – Labour

1. School streets – Yes, I’d love to see one in Reddish North. I think the trial in Reddish South was very successful. The Labour group continues to search for the funding to make it possible

2. Barrier-free active travel – Absolutely. Everyone should have the right to make use of outdoor space. Inaccessible infrastructure simply serves to make life harder for those in wheelchairs, tricycles, cargo bikes etc. while providing no obvious reduction in antisocial behaviour.

3. 20 mph speed limits – Yes. Reddish North is home to several 20MPH zones and I am keen to see them expanded, given the benefits. I do, however, think it’s very important to consult with residents about how they’ve been impacted by these changes and make adjustments where necessary.

4. Space for cycling – Yes. Cycling should be a viable commuting option, particularly for short journeys. Segregated cycle lanes have been shown to increase confidence for women and younger cyclists and I think increasing care needs to be paid as to how cyclists can enter and exit cycle lanes safely.

5. Anything else? – I think some pavements in Reddish North are obviously the result of several decisions, based around cars, cobbled together. I’d like to see a renewal that is more centred around the needs of pedestrians.
 

Reddish South

Liz Crix – Green Party

1. School streets – Yes.

2. Barrier-free active travel – Yes.

3. 20 mph speed limits – Yes.

4. Space for cycling – Yes.
 

James Frizzell – Green Party

1. School streets – Yes.

2. Barrier-free active travel – Yes.

3. 20 mph speed limits – Yes.

4. Space for cycling – Yes.

5. Anything else? – I would do everything possible to improve walking, wheeling and cycling in Stockport.

2 replies on “Stockport 2023 elections candidate questionnaire”